<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1613 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356192</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling that disputes on service classification are not maintainable under Section 35G of the Act. The Court emphasized adherence to Litigation Policy guidelines, including the appeal value threshold, in determining appeal maintainability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 07:10:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1613 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356192</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling that disputes on service classification are not maintainable under Section 35G of the Act. The Court emphasized adherence to Litigation Policy guidelines, including the appeal value threshold, in determining appeal maintainability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>