<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1602 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356181</link>
    <description>The Karnataka High Court disposed of the petition by directing the petitioner to pursue the statutory appeal remedy under the Act. It further instructed the appellate authority to entertain an appeal filed within the stipulated period without raising an objection on limitation. The operative effect was that the petitioner was left to the appellate forum, while ensuring that a timely appeal would not be rejected on the ground of limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 07:09:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1602 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356181</link>
      <description>The Karnataka High Court disposed of the petition by directing the petitioner to pursue the statutory appeal remedy under the Act. It further instructed the appellate authority to entertain an appeal filed within the stipulated period without raising an objection on limitation. The operative effect was that the petitioner was left to the appellate forum, while ensuring that a timely appeal would not be rejected on the ground of limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>