<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1159 - ITAT AMRITSAR (SMC).</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199353</link>
    <description>The Tribunal invalidated the reopening of the case due to insufficient reasons to believe in income escapement based on vague information about cash deposits. Jurisdictional issues were crucial, leading to the cancellation of the assessment order. Procedural irregularities, including failure to supply reasons during reassessment and lack of opportunity to produce evidence, resulted in the annulment of the assessment order. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to legal requirements in tax assessments, ultimately annulling the reassessment and subsequent decisions due to various procedural flaws and jurisdictional deficiencies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 17:36:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1159 - ITAT AMRITSAR (SMC).</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199353</link>
      <description>The Tribunal invalidated the reopening of the case due to insufficient reasons to believe in income escapement based on vague information about cash deposits. Jurisdictional issues were crucial, leading to the cancellation of the assessment order. Procedural irregularities, including failure to supply reasons during reassessment and lack of opportunity to produce evidence, resulted in the annulment of the assessment order. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to legal requirements in tax assessments, ultimately annulling the reassessment and subsequent decisions due to various procedural flaws and jurisdictional deficiencies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>