https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199343 Verification of pleadings under Order VI Rule 15 CPC serves to fix responsibility and deter false or reckless pleadings. Where a plaint is verified by an attorney rather than the plaintiff, the verifier must be shown to the court's satisfaction to be acquainted with the facts of the case; a bare power of attorney authorising signature is insufficient. Because the plaint contained serious allegations and only the power of attorney was produced, the court found the verification defective and required the plaintiff to verify the plaint personally. The objection to verification succeeded, while the objection relating to signing of the vakalatnama and plaint did not. en-us Wed, 19 Dec 1956 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Feb 2018 17:23:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199343 Verification of pleadings under Order VI Rule 15 CPC serves to fix responsibility and deter false or reckless pleadings. Where a plaint is verified by an attorney rather than the plaintiff, the verifier must be shown to the court's satisfaction to be acquainted with the facts of the case; a bare power of attorney authorising signature is insufficient. Because the plaint contained serious allegations and only the power of attorney was produced, the court found the verification defective and required the plaintiff to verify the plaint personally. The objection to verification succeeded, while the objection relating to signing of the vakalatnama and plaint did not. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Dec 1956 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199343