https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199339 The court held that individual notice to partners or persons in charge of a company is not necessary in cases of dishonored cheques under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The judgment emphasized that partners in a firm are automatically implicated without separate notices. The court concluded that only the drawer of the cheque needs to be given notice, as individuals in charge of the company are deemed to be aware of its transactions. Consequently, the court upheld the trial court's decision to arraign the partners as accused persons based on the provisions of sections 138 and 141 of the Act. en-us Wed, 12 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Feb 2018 16:49:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199339 The court held that individual notice to partners or persons in charge of a company is not necessary in cases of dishonored cheques under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The judgment emphasized that partners in a firm are automatically implicated without separate notices. The court concluded that only the drawer of the cheque needs to be given notice, as individuals in charge of the company are deemed to be aware of its transactions. Consequently, the court upheld the trial court's decision to arraign the partners as accused persons based on the provisions of sections 138 and 141 of the Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 12 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199339