<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (11) TMI 538 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199338</link>
    <description>Prior custody determinations remain binding inter partes unless a substantial change in circumstances is shown, and any request to alter custody must be tested against the child&#039;s welfare. Superior financial capacity or the ability to provide education abroad, by itself, is insufficient to disturb a stable custody arrangement where the child is settled and progressing well. Removal of the child from a foreign jurisdiction and non-production before the Indian court may be relevant, but they do not automatically disqualify the custodial parent; welfare remains the controlling consideration. Temporary custody was refused where it risked disrupting the child&#039;s routine, but limited, regulated visitation was appropriate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 16:41:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (11) TMI 538 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199338</link>
      <description>Prior custody determinations remain binding inter partes unless a substantial change in circumstances is shown, and any request to alter custody must be tested against the child&#039;s welfare. Superior financial capacity or the ability to provide education abroad, by itself, is insufficient to disturb a stable custody arrangement where the child is settled and progressing well. Removal of the child from a foreign jurisdiction and non-production before the Indian court may be relevant, but they do not automatically disqualify the custodial parent; welfare remains the controlling consideration. Temporary custody was refused where it risked disrupting the child&#039;s routine, but limited, regulated visitation was appropriate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>