<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (10) TMI 80 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199335</link>
    <description>Registration in the electoral roll must be questioned within the statutory machinery under the Representation of the People Act, 1950, including the prescribed processes for objection, revision, correction and appeal. A collateral enquiry in an election petition into the correctness of an entry, including ordinary residence for registration purposes, is not permissible unless a constitutional disqualification is shown. The Court distinguished challenges to electoral roll entries from challenges based on constitutional ineligibility and affirmed that the roll entry could not be reopened in the election petition; the finding in favour of the returned candidate was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 16:17:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (10) TMI 80 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199335</link>
      <description>Registration in the electoral roll must be questioned within the statutory machinery under the Representation of the People Act, 1950, including the prescribed processes for objection, revision, correction and appeal. A collateral enquiry in an election petition into the correctness of an entry, including ordinary residence for registration purposes, is not permissible unless a constitutional disqualification is shown. The Court distinguished challenges to electoral roll entries from challenges based on constitutional ineligibility and affirmed that the roll entry could not be reopened in the election petition; the finding in favour of the returned candidate was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>