<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (11) TMI 176 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199333</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and decree, and restoring the trial court&#039;s decision. The appellant was declared the adopted son of Jagannathdas and Premwati, entitled to a share of the estate, and the trust was declared void. The trustees were ordered to render accounts, and the suit was not barred by limitation. The appellant was awarded costs from the second and ninth respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 16:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510565" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (11) TMI 176 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199333</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the High Court&#039;s judgment and decree, and restoring the trial court&#039;s decision. The appellant was declared the adopted son of Jagannathdas and Premwati, entitled to a share of the estate, and the trust was declared void. The trustees were ordered to render accounts, and the suit was not barred by limitation. The appellant was awarded costs from the second and ninth respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>