https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199323 In proceedings for attachment before judgment, security under Order 38, Rules 5 and 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure is not confined to the defendant's own undertaking and may be furnished by a third party. Read with Rule 5 and Form No. 6 in Appendix F, Rule 6 does not exclude third-party surety security, which may undertake liability for production of the property or its value. The rejection of such security was therefore unsustainable, but the trial court still had to examine, after hearing the plaintiff's objections, whether the property offered was adequate to secure any decree that might be passed. The matter was remitted for that determination. en-us Mon, 22 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Feb 2018 14:20:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199323 In proceedings for attachment before judgment, security under Order 38, Rules 5 and 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure is not confined to the defendant's own undertaking and may be furnished by a third party. Read with Rule 5 and Form No. 6 in Appendix F, Rule 6 does not exclude third-party surety security, which may undertake liability for production of the property or its value. The rejection of such security was therefore unsustainable, but the trial court still had to examine, after hearing the plaintiff's objections, whether the property offered was adequate to secure any decree that might be passed. The matter was remitted for that determination. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 22 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199323