https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199320 The Board found that the petitioners failed to substantiate their allegations of mismanagement against the respondents. Despite this, due to the strained relationship between the parties, the Board ordered the purchase of the petitioners' shares by either the respondents or the company to avoid future disputes and ensure the company's operational continuity. An independent chartered accountant was tasked with valuing the shares, and the purchase was to be finalized within a specified period. en-us Fri, 18 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Feb 2018 14:15:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199320 The Board found that the petitioners failed to substantiate their allegations of mismanagement against the respondents. Despite this, due to the strained relationship between the parties, the Board ordered the purchase of the petitioners' shares by either the respondents or the company to avoid future disputes and ensure the company's operational continuity. An independent chartered accountant was tasked with valuing the shares, and the purchase was to be finalized within a specified period. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 18 Jun 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199320