https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199312 The court dismissed the application, upholding the lower court's decision. It found the notice was validly served, the Explanatory Statement met legal standards, the company had authority for new activities, and all necessary facts were disclosed to shareholders. The court clarified its observations were interim and not final. Costs were awarded to the appellant, certified for two counsel, and any interim orders were lifted. en-us Thu, 22 Apr 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Feb 2018 12:30:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199312 The court dismissed the application, upholding the lower court's decision. It found the notice was validly served, the Explanatory Statement met legal standards, the company had authority for new activities, and all necessary facts were disclosed to shareholders. The court clarified its observations were interim and not final. Costs were awarded to the appellant, certified for two counsel, and any interim orders were lifted. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 22 Apr 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199312