https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199310 The Supreme Court held that Gulab Singh was not entitled to a share in the decree obtained by Gattu Lal due to his lack of financial contribution, his father's false testimony, and the application of the doctrine of laches. The court emphasized the importance of diligence and fairness in partnership matters, ruling that partners cannot opportunistically claim profits after remaining inactive during the venture. Gulab Singh's conduct and failure to actively participate in the partnership precluded him from claiming a share in the decree, leading to the dismissal of his claim. en-us Fri, 18 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Feb 2018 11:31:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199310 The Supreme Court held that Gulab Singh was not entitled to a share in the decree obtained by Gattu Lal due to his lack of financial contribution, his father's false testimony, and the application of the doctrine of laches. The court emphasized the importance of diligence and fairness in partnership matters, ruling that partners cannot opportunistically claim profits after remaining inactive during the venture. Gulab Singh's conduct and failure to actively participate in the partnership precluded him from claiming a share in the decree, leading to the dismissal of his claim. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199310