<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1589 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356168</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, quashing the CIT&#039;s order passed under section 263. The Tribunal held that the lack of inquiry by the Assessing Officer did not automatically render the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue. The original assessment order allowing prior period expenses was restored, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was successful.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 08:30:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1589 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356168</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, quashing the CIT&#039;s order passed under section 263. The Tribunal held that the lack of inquiry by the Assessing Officer did not automatically render the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue. The original assessment order allowing prior period expenses was restored, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was successful.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356168</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>