<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1567 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356146</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the tax demand on services provided by a practicing Chartered Accountant, determining that the services fell under &quot;Management Consultant Service&quot; based on interpretative principles and ethical standards. The appellant&#039;s arguments for exemption and revenue-neutrality were dismissed, with the Tribunal finding that the services rendered to corporate entities indeed fell within the taxable category. Specific agreements for advisory services were also deemed to fall under the same service classification. The appeal was dismissed, citing statutory provisions and the nature of the appellant&#039;s profession as supporting factors for upholding the tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 11:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510465" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1567 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356146</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the tax demand on services provided by a practicing Chartered Accountant, determining that the services fell under &quot;Management Consultant Service&quot; based on interpretative principles and ethical standards. The appellant&#039;s arguments for exemption and revenue-neutrality were dismissed, with the Tribunal finding that the services rendered to corporate entities indeed fell within the taxable category. Specific agreements for advisory services were also deemed to fall under the same service classification. The appeal was dismissed, citing statutory provisions and the nature of the appellant&#039;s profession as supporting factors for upholding the tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356146</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>