https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356133 The Tribunal held that the appellants were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 08/2003-CE from 01/04/2004 as they had validly assigned Trade Marks for consideration. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and Show Cause Notices prior to 01/04/2004 were deemed unsustainable. The Tribunal allowed the appeals, granting consequential relief to the appellants regarding the confiscation of goods and penalties imposed under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal's decision was based on the analysis of the assignment of Trade Marks, leading to the favorable outcome for the appellants in all aspects of the case. en-us Wed, 08 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 Mar 2018 10:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356133 The Tribunal held that the appellants were entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 08/2003-CE from 01/04/2004 as they had validly assigned Trade Marks for consideration. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and Show Cause Notices prior to 01/04/2004 were deemed unsustainable. The Tribunal allowed the appeals, granting consequential relief to the appellants regarding the confiscation of goods and penalties imposed under the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal's decision was based on the analysis of the assignment of Trade Marks, leading to the favorable outcome for the appellants in all aspects of the case. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 08 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356133