<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1553 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356132</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that neither the excess finished goods nor the raw material found in the factory are liable for confiscation. Consequently, the redemption fine and penalty imposed on the appellant were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with any consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 11:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1553 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356132</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that neither the excess finished goods nor the raw material found in the factory are liable for confiscation. Consequently, the redemption fine and penalty imposed on the appellant were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with any consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>