<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1547 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356126</link>
    <description>The court found violations of natural justice in the assessment order due to lack of proper notice and opportunity for the petitioner to respond. The re-assessment based on a third-party complaint was deemed invalid as the petitioner was not given a chance to refute the claims. The closure of the business premises and relocation of the proprietor to Ireland were confirmed, rendering the enforcement actions flawed. Procedural flaws in the enforcement proceedings, including inadequate investigation and lack of opportunity for the petitioner to counter allegations, led to the quashing of assessment orders. The judgment emphasized the importance of procedural fairness in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 08:25:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1547 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356126</link>
      <description>The court found violations of natural justice in the assessment order due to lack of proper notice and opportunity for the petitioner to respond. The re-assessment based on a third-party complaint was deemed invalid as the petitioner was not given a chance to refute the claims. The closure of the business premises and relocation of the proprietor to Ireland were confirmed, rendering the enforcement actions flawed. Procedural flaws in the enforcement proceedings, including inadequate investigation and lack of opportunity for the petitioner to counter allegations, led to the quashing of assessment orders. The judgment emphasized the importance of procedural fairness in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>