<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1543 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356122</link>
    <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty imposed under section 18(1)(c) of the Wealth Tax Act due to the penalty notice being issued without specifying the exact reason for initiation, rendering it invalid. As a result, the Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and allowed the appeals filed by the assessees, leading to the cancellation of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 08:25:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510441" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1543 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356122</link>
      <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty imposed under section 18(1)(c) of the Wealth Tax Act due to the penalty notice being issued without specifying the exact reason for initiation, rendering it invalid. As a result, the Tribunal set aside the lower authorities&#039; orders and allowed the appeals filed by the assessees, leading to the cancellation of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>