https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199304 A sub-contractual claim for revised rates failed because the principal contract terms were not shown to be incorporated into the appellant's own contract with the respondent. The governing contract contained only an escalation clause, so the claim had to be tested solely by that clause and not by terms said to operate in an earlier contract chain. An arbitral award based on contractual terms not applicable to the parties was treated as a jurisdictional error and could be interfered with without reappraising evidence. The claimant was therefore confined to the amount admissible under the escalation clause, and the award was unsustainable to the extent challenged. en-us Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Apr 2023 14:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199304 A sub-contractual claim for revised rates failed because the principal contract terms were not shown to be incorporated into the appellant's own contract with the respondent. The governing contract contained only an escalation clause, so the claim had to be tested solely by that clause and not by terms said to operate in an earlier contract chain. An arbitral award based on contractual terms not applicable to the parties was treated as a jurisdictional error and could be interfered with without reappraising evidence. The claimant was therefore confined to the amount admissible under the escalation clause, and the award was unsustainable to the extent challenged. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199304