<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (4) TMI 297 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199289</link>
    <description>An unchallenged statutory redemption order under the Redemption of Mortgages (Punjab) Act, 1913 attained conclusiveness because no suit under section 12 was filed, and the possession delivered under that order could be treated as a subsequent event materially affecting the maintainability of the appeal. The plea of lis pendens under section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act failed because the situation did not arise from a transfer by parties during the pendency of litigation, but from the operative effect of the statutory order itself. On that basis, the appeal was liable to be dismissed as infructuous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2018 16:25:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (4) TMI 297 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199289</link>
      <description>An unchallenged statutory redemption order under the Redemption of Mortgages (Punjab) Act, 1913 attained conclusiveness because no suit under section 12 was filed, and the possession delivered under that order could be treated as a subsequent event materially affecting the maintainability of the appeal. The plea of lis pendens under section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act failed because the situation did not arise from a transfer by parties during the pendency of litigation, but from the operative effect of the statutory order itself. On that basis, the appeal was liable to be dismissed as infructuous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199289</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>