https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199284 Amendment of the plaint and prayer clause was upheld because it arose from subsequent events, reflected the controversy already pleaded, and did not alter the suit's basic character; the court applied the test of necessity for deciding the real controversy and absence of irremediable prejudice, and permitted the amendments to avoid multiplicity of proceedings. Impleadment of Walchandnagar Industries Ltd. was also sustained because the pleaded case alleged its direct role in the attempted substitution of the plaintiffs and the amended reliefs were claimed against it, making it a necessary party for complete adjudication. The court distinguished impleadment principles in specific performance suits as inapplicable. en-us Fri, 24 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Feb 2018 14:52:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199284 Amendment of the plaint and prayer clause was upheld because it arose from subsequent events, reflected the controversy already pleaded, and did not alter the suit's basic character; the court applied the test of necessity for deciding the real controversy and absence of irremediable prejudice, and permitted the amendments to avoid multiplicity of proceedings. Impleadment of Walchandnagar Industries Ltd. was also sustained because the pleaded case alleged its direct role in the attempted substitution of the plaintiffs and the amended reliefs were claimed against it, making it a necessary party for complete adjudication. The court distinguished impleadment principles in specific performance suits as inapplicable. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 24 Dec 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199284