<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 1172 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199280</link>
    <description>A proposed purchaser of hotel property may be impleaded where the suit seeks declarations that contractual obligations bind assignees and the sale occurred subject to disclosed encumbrances. The text explains that a necessary party is one whose presence is required for complete and effective adjudication and whose rights may be prejudiced by the decree. Because the property was sold during the suit and the purchasers stepped into the shoes of the secured creditors, their participation was considered necessary for a comprehensive decree affecting the assignees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2018 14:25:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 1172 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199280</link>
      <description>A proposed purchaser of hotel property may be impleaded where the suit seeks declarations that contractual obligations bind assignees and the sale occurred subject to disclosed encumbrances. The text explains that a necessary party is one whose presence is required for complete and effective adjudication and whose rights may be prejudiced by the decree. Because the property was sold during the suit and the purchasers stepped into the shoes of the secured creditors, their participation was considered necessary for a comprehensive decree affecting the assignees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199280</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>