<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (3) TMI 697 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199270</link>
    <description>A co-operative bank may fall outside Article 12 and still be amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 where its statutory and certified service obligations amount to a public duty. The bank&#039;s summary termination of employees without notice, hearing, or compliance with the certified Standing Orders was treated as contrary to natural justice and illegal, so the termination orders were quashed with consequential relief. The bank also could not freeze an ex-manager&#039;s savings account merely on apprehended liability after his resignation had been accepted; access to the account was restored subject to furnishing the stipulated security bond.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2018 10:49:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (3) TMI 697 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199270</link>
      <description>A co-operative bank may fall outside Article 12 and still be amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226 where its statutory and certified service obligations amount to a public duty. The bank&#039;s summary termination of employees without notice, hearing, or compliance with the certified Standing Orders was treated as contrary to natural justice and illegal, so the termination orders were quashed with consequential relief. The bank also could not freeze an ex-manager&#039;s savings account merely on apprehended liability after his resignation had been accepted; access to the account was restored subject to furnishing the stipulated security bond.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>