<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellant Challenges Higher Excise Duty on Petroleum Products Sold via COCO Outlets Due to Dealer Commission Inclusion.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38103</link>
    <description>Valuation - sale of petroleum products through dealers - the appellant had discharged more excise duty on the clearances to and from COCO outlet, wherein the assessable value is more than the assessable value of the petroleum products cleared to dealers, which implies that the commission which has been extended to dealers has been included in the value. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2018 08:44:54 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2018 08:44:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510306" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellant Challenges Higher Excise Duty on Petroleum Products Sold via COCO Outlets Due to Dealer Commission Inclusion.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38103</link>
      <description>Valuation - sale of petroleum products through dealers - the appellant had discharged more excise duty on the clearances to and from COCO outlet, wherein the assessable value is more than the assessable value of the petroleum products cleared to dealers, which implies that the commission which has been extended to dealers has been included in the value. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2018 08:44:54 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=38103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>