https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356119 Contempt petitions arising from alleged non-compliance over GST payment on contract bills were not pursued for punitive action. The Madras HC noted that the petitioners' representations were still pending and that the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes was the competent authority to consider them. To avoid further hardship, the Court directed the authority to examine the representations on merits, decide them in accordance with law within the time fixed, and afford a personal hearing to the authorised representative of the association. en-us Fri, 08 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Jun 2025 16:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356119 Contempt petitions arising from alleged non-compliance over GST payment on contract bills were not pursued for punitive action. The Madras HC noted that the petitioners' representations were still pending and that the Commissioner of Commercial Taxes was the competent authority to consider them. To avoid further hardship, the Court directed the authority to examine the representations on merits, decide them in accordance with law within the time fixed, and afford a personal hearing to the authorised representative of the association. Case-Laws GST Fri, 08 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356119