https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356116 The High Court allowed the petition filed by a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) challenging the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax's rejection of their application for condoning the delay in filing the income tax return for the assessment year 2009-2010. The Court found the Chief Commissioner's reasons insufficient, noting that the delay was not intentional to avoid scrutiny and that there was ample time for scrutiny even if the return was filed within the deadline. The Court directed that the petitioner's return would be treated as valid from the date of the Court's order for scrutiny and assessment purposes, setting aside the Chief Commissioner's decision. en-us Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 May 2018 12:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356116 The High Court allowed the petition filed by a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) challenging the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax's rejection of their application for condoning the delay in filing the income tax return for the assessment year 2009-2010. The Court found the Chief Commissioner's reasons insufficient, noting that the delay was not intentional to avoid scrutiny and that there was ample time for scrutiny even if the return was filed within the deadline. The Court directed that the petitioner's return would be treated as valid from the date of the Court's order for scrutiny and assessment purposes, setting aside the Chief Commissioner's decision. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356116