<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1536 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356115</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the petition challenging the notice to reopen the assessment for the assessment year 2012-13. The court found that the reasons for reopening the assessment were invalid as the improvement cost was already disclosed in the petitioner&#039;s books and return, supported by evidence such as a valuer&#039;s report. As a result, the court set aside the notice and disposed of the case in favor of the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2020 12:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510298" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1536 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356115</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the petition challenging the notice to reopen the assessment for the assessment year 2012-13. The court found that the reasons for reopening the assessment were invalid as the improvement cost was already disclosed in the petitioner&#039;s books and return, supported by evidence such as a valuer&#039;s report. As a result, the court set aside the notice and disposed of the case in favor of the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>