<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1533 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356112</link>
    <description>The court held that the penalty order was time-barred and invalid as it was passed beyond the prescribed limitation period. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee, setting aside the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to clear and certain limitation periods to ensure certainty and finality in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2018 18:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1533 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356112</link>
      <description>The court held that the penalty order was time-barred and invalid as it was passed beyond the prescribed limitation period. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee, setting aside the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to clear and certain limitation periods to ensure certainty and finality in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>