<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 13 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12016</link>
    <description>The High Court of Karnataka dismissed writ petitions as the appellants failed to utilize the available appeal remedy under section 260A of the Income-tax Act and could not invoke discretionary jurisdiction under articles 226 and 227 to challenge the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order. Appellants were advised to pursue the appropriate remedy by challenging the Tribunal&#039;s orders with an application for condonation of delay if required.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 17:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 13 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12016</link>
      <description>The High Court of Karnataka dismissed writ petitions as the appellants failed to utilize the available appeal remedy under section 260A of the Income-tax Act and could not invoke discretionary jurisdiction under articles 226 and 227 to challenge the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order. Appellants were advised to pursue the appropriate remedy by challenging the Tribunal&#039;s orders with an application for condonation of delay if required.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>