https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356089 A writ court cannot direct payment of premium under a REP licence scheme after the scheme and supporting circular have ceased to operate, particularly where the claimant seeks relief after prolonged delay. The policy benefit was confined to the scheme's own framework and period, so no enforceable right survived to demand payment years later. The court could not use writ jurisdiction to continue, revive, or extend an expired policy regime, and the changed policy position further weighed against relief. The claim therefore failed because the asserted entitlement was time-barred in substance by the scheme's limited duration and the absence of a subsisting legal right. en-us Thu, 08 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Sep 2018 11:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356089 A writ court cannot direct payment of premium under a REP licence scheme after the scheme and supporting circular have ceased to operate, particularly where the claimant seeks relief after prolonged delay. The policy benefit was confined to the scheme's own framework and period, so no enforceable right survived to demand payment years later. The court could not use writ jurisdiction to continue, revive, or extend an expired policy regime, and the changed policy position further weighed against relief. The claim therefore failed because the asserted entitlement was time-barred in substance by the scheme's limited duration and the absence of a subsisting legal right. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 08 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356089