<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1501 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356080</link>
    <description>A regulated professional structure may be scrutinised where multinational accounting firms and connected Indian firms appear to use common branding, fee sharing, holding out, or network arrangements to mask foreign control and possible circumvention of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and professional conduct rules. The text also treats remittances, grants, network charges, and related foreign receipts as requiring examination under FDI and FEMA restrictions where their true nature may amount to impermissible participation in Indian business. It further stresses that public-interest audit regulation may justify expert reconsideration of enforcement gaps and the need for stronger oversight.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2018 12:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1501 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356080</link>
      <description>A regulated professional structure may be scrutinised where multinational accounting firms and connected Indian firms appear to use common branding, fee sharing, holding out, or network arrangements to mask foreign control and possible circumvention of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 and professional conduct rules. The text also treats remittances, grants, network charges, and related foreign receipts as requiring examination under FDI and FEMA restrictions where their true nature may amount to impermissible participation in Indian business. It further stresses that public-interest audit regulation may justify expert reconsideration of enforcement gaps and the need for stronger oversight.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>