https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356078 Mandatory food labelling norms require every package to disclose the manufacturer's name and complete address, and, where applicable, those of the packer or bottler. A supplier cannot be presented as the manufacturer where the record establishes otherwise. Non-compliance with these disclosure requirements justified rejection of the imported food consignment and refusal of a no-objection certificate. The labelling defect was subject to strict compliance under applicable FSSAI guidelines and regulations, and writ jurisdiction could not be used to direct its rectification or relaxation. Expiry of the goods' relevant shelf-life period further militated against intervention. The challenge failed, subject only to the indicated liberty concerning re-export and demurrage. en-us Tue, 24 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Apr 2018 11:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356078 Mandatory food labelling norms require every package to disclose the manufacturer's name and complete address, and, where applicable, those of the packer or bottler. A supplier cannot be presented as the manufacturer where the record establishes otherwise. Non-compliance with these disclosure requirements justified rejection of the imported food consignment and refusal of a no-objection certificate. The labelling defect was subject to strict compliance under applicable FSSAI guidelines and regulations, and writ jurisdiction could not be used to direct its rectification or relaxation. Expiry of the goods' relevant shelf-life period further militated against intervention. The challenge failed, subject only to the indicated liberty concerning re-export and demurrage. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 24 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356078