<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1498 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356077</link>
    <description>Charges collected by an industrial development corporation for amenities, maintenance, management and repairs in industrial estates were treated as part of its statutory duties under the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961. Applying the distinction in the Board circular between sovereign or statutory functions and taxable services rendered for consideration, the court held that receipts collected in discharge of compulsory statutory obligations amount to a levy and not consideration for taxable service. As the record did not show any activity outside the statutory framework, the service tax demand was held not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2019 14:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510260" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1498 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356077</link>
      <description>Charges collected by an industrial development corporation for amenities, maintenance, management and repairs in industrial estates were treated as part of its statutory duties under the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961. Applying the distinction in the Board circular between sovereign or statutory functions and taxable services rendered for consideration, the court held that receipts collected in discharge of compulsory statutory obligations amount to a levy and not consideration for taxable service. As the record did not show any activity outside the statutory framework, the service tax demand was held not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>