<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1496 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356075</link>
    <description>The High Court partially allowed the appeals challenging the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, which remanded the appeals for a fresh decision on merits without considering the &quot;Coal Supply Agreement&quot; aspect. The Court found the Tribunal&#039;s order unsustainable for not awaiting the decision of the Larger Bench. It quashed the order, remitting the matter back to the Tribunal to await the Larger Bench&#039;s decision on the issue involved. The Court clarified that certain points would not be reopened and left open questions regarding the taxability of the service for subsequent adjudication. No costs were awarded in the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 12:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1496 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356075</link>
      <description>The High Court partially allowed the appeals challenging the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, which remanded the appeals for a fresh decision on merits without considering the &quot;Coal Supply Agreement&quot; aspect. The Court found the Tribunal&#039;s order unsustainable for not awaiting the decision of the Larger Bench. It quashed the order, remitting the matter back to the Tribunal to await the Larger Bench&#039;s decision on the issue involved. The Court clarified that certain points would not be reopened and left open questions regarding the taxability of the service for subsequent adjudication. No costs were awarded in the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>