https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356068 The appellate tribunal in CESTAT Mumbai's judgment allowed the appeal regarding the deduction of average freight and transit insurance for a manufacturer of excisable goods. The tribunal upheld the appellant's argument that the exclusion of freight and insurance beyond the place of removal was permissible, citing legal precedents. Additionally, the tribunal remanded the issue of the admissibility of the deduction of actual excise duty paid for further findings. The decision emphasized the importance of proper legal interpretations, precedents, and comprehensive assessments in resolving such matters fairly. en-us Thu, 11 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Feb 2018 08:21:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356068 The appellate tribunal in CESTAT Mumbai's judgment allowed the appeal regarding the deduction of average freight and transit insurance for a manufacturer of excisable goods. The tribunal upheld the appellant's argument that the exclusion of freight and insurance beyond the place of removal was permissible, citing legal precedents. Additionally, the tribunal remanded the issue of the admissibility of the deduction of actual excise duty paid for further findings. The decision emphasized the importance of proper legal interpretations, precedents, and comprehensive assessments in resolving such matters fairly. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 11 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356068