https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356066 The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to CENVAT credit on common input services used in the factory, except for outdoor catering services. It was determined that services related to production were eligible for credit, while common amenities were to be distributed based on individual unit turnover. The Tribunal denied credit for outdoor catering services due to personal consumption by employees, distinguishing a prior judgment. The matter was remanded for re-quantification of credit based on turnover proportions. en-us Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Feb 2018 08:21:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356066 The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to CENVAT credit on common input services used in the factory, except for outdoor catering services. It was determined that services related to production were eligible for credit, while common amenities were to be distributed based on individual unit turnover. The Tribunal denied credit for outdoor catering services due to personal consumption by employees, distinguishing a prior judgment. The matter was remanded for re-quantification of credit based on turnover proportions. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 20 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356066