<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1484 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356063</link>
    <description>The appeals by M/s Euronet Global Development Centre against the rejection of their refund claim for tax paid on services used for authorized operations under the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 were allowed. The court set aside the order and remanded the matter to verify the reversal of CENVAT credit. If confirmed, the original authority must reconsider the refund claim as if the credit had never been availed, following precedents indicating that subsequent reversal of credit amounts to credit not being taken.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2018 08:21:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1484 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356063</link>
      <description>The appeals by M/s Euronet Global Development Centre against the rejection of their refund claim for tax paid on services used for authorized operations under the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005 were allowed. The court set aside the order and remanded the matter to verify the reversal of CENVAT credit. If confirmed, the original authority must reconsider the refund claim as if the credit had never been availed, following precedents indicating that subsequent reversal of credit amounts to credit not being taken.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=356063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>