https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199258 The Tribunal, after considering precedents, ruled in favor of the appellant, a cement manufacturer, allowing the appeal and setting aside the demand for differential duty. The Tribunal determined that Contractors, Builders, Developers, and Big Companies qualified as Industrial/Institutional Consumers for cement sales in 50 Kgs bags without printing RSP, aligning with established legal principles from previous cases. This decision clarified the interpretation of the term Industrial/Institutional Consumers in such transactions, providing relief to the appellant. en-us Fri, 27 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Feb 2018 08:19:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199258 The Tribunal, after considering precedents, ruled in favor of the appellant, a cement manufacturer, allowing the appeal and setting aside the demand for differential duty. The Tribunal determined that Contractors, Builders, Developers, and Big Companies qualified as Industrial/Institutional Consumers for cement sales in 50 Kgs bags without printing RSP, aligning with established legal principles from previous cases. This decision clarified the interpretation of the term Industrial/Institutional Consumers in such transactions, providing relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 27 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199258