<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1696 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199262</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision in favor of the assessee. The judgment emphasized the genuine commercial considerations behind the reduced sale prices and the necessity of the advance for project completion. The Tribunal found no evidence of sham transactions or tax evasion, concluding that the reduced sale prices were a legitimate commercial consideration for the advance received from related parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2018 08:19:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1696 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199262</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision in favor of the assessee. The judgment emphasized the genuine commercial considerations behind the reduced sale prices and the necessity of the advance for project completion. The Tribunal found no evidence of sham transactions or tax evasion, concluding that the reduced sale prices were a legitimate commercial consideration for the advance received from related parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199262</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>