https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199266 Pendency of an application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 did not bar the applicants from filing a reply in the main petition. The Tribunal allowed the reply to be filed without prejudice to the applicants' stand in the pending Section 8 application and granted time for filing after service on the other side. The operative effect was that participation in the main petition could proceed while the arbitration objection remained open for determination. en-us Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 24 Feb 2018 08:19:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199266 Pendency of an application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 did not bar the applicants from filing a reply in the main petition. The Tribunal allowed the reply to be filed without prejudice to the applicants' stand in the pending Section 8 application and granted time for filing after service on the other side. The operative effect was that participation in the main petition could proceed while the arbitration objection remained open for determination. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199266