<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 1149 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199251</link>
    <description>The Company Law Board may modify or vacate an interim order in light of subsequent events without exercising a review power; review of an earlier order is unavailable except where fraud or fabricated documents are involved. An interim order becomes effective when communicated to the parties, and formal pronouncement in open court is not mandatory. Deletion of a pre-emption right from articles of association following conversion to a public limited company may be valid where the right conflicts with the Companies Act, 1956. Amendment of the articles and implementation of an EOGM resolution require compliance with corporate voting and procedural requirements; absent proof of oppression, mismanagement, mala fides or illegality, majority action is not invalidated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 17:47:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510218" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 1149 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199251</link>
      <description>The Company Law Board may modify or vacate an interim order in light of subsequent events without exercising a review power; review of an earlier order is unavailable except where fraud or fabricated documents are involved. An interim order becomes effective when communicated to the parties, and formal pronouncement in open court is not mandatory. Deletion of a pre-emption right from articles of association following conversion to a public limited company may be valid where the right conflicts with the Companies Act, 1956. Amendment of the articles and implementation of an EOGM resolution require compliance with corporate voting and procedural requirements; absent proof of oppression, mismanagement, mala fides or illegality, majority action is not invalidated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>