https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199248 An ex parte ad interim injunction against the State could not stand where the defendants objected that no notice had been served under Section 80(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Although a suit for injunction may in appropriate cases be filed against the State without prior notice under Section 80(1), that relaxation does not extend to interim relief without notice under Section 80(2). A jurisdictional objection to the injunction therefore required immediate consideration, and the trial court erred in postponing it on irrelevant grounds. The impugned order refusing to recall the injunction was set aside and the matter remitted for prompt fresh consideration. en-us Mon, 20 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Feb 2018 17:33:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199248 An ex parte ad interim injunction against the State could not stand where the defendants objected that no notice had been served under Section 80(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Although a suit for injunction may in appropriate cases be filed against the State without prior notice under Section 80(1), that relaxation does not extend to interim relief without notice under Section 80(2). A jurisdictional objection to the injunction therefore required immediate consideration, and the trial court erred in postponing it on irrelevant grounds. The impugned order refusing to recall the injunction was set aside and the matter remitted for prompt fresh consideration. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 20 Feb 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199248