https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199247 Section 80 CPC requires strict compliance, and the notice must identify the same person who later institutes the suit. A notice issued in a trade name cannot satisfy the provision where the plaint is filed by the individual proprietor in his own name unless the trade name is shown to be a legal entity capable of suing. Because the notices here were in the name of "S. N. Dutt & Co." while the suit was filed by the sole proprietor, Surrendra Nath Dutta, the requisite identity between the notice-giver and the plaintiff was absent. The notice was therefore invalid and the suit was not maintainable for non-compliance with Section 80. en-us Mon, 27 Mar 1961 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Feb 2018 17:30:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199247 Section 80 CPC requires strict compliance, and the notice must identify the same person who later institutes the suit. A notice issued in a trade name cannot satisfy the provision where the plaint is filed by the individual proprietor in his own name unless the trade name is shown to be a legal entity capable of suing. Because the notices here were in the name of "S. N. Dutt & Co." while the suit was filed by the sole proprietor, Surrendra Nath Dutta, the requisite identity between the notice-giver and the plaintiff was absent. The notice was therefore invalid and the suit was not maintainable for non-compliance with Section 80. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 27 Mar 1961 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199247