https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199246 Leave to institute a suit against the Government without prior notice under Section 80(2) CPC remains effective once granted on satisfaction of urgency, and a later refusal of interim relief does not retrospectively render the suit incompetent. The order treating the suit as not maintainable was therefore set aside. On the transfer challenge, vague allegations of mala fides and the administrative context did not justify interference in revision; no sufficient prima facie case for injunction or failure of justice was shown. The refusal of interim injunction against transfer was sustained. en-us Tue, 06 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Feb 2018 17:26:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199246 Leave to institute a suit against the Government without prior notice under Section 80(2) CPC remains effective once granted on satisfaction of urgency, and a later refusal of interim relief does not retrospectively render the suit incompetent. The order treating the suit as not maintainable was therefore set aside. On the transfer challenge, vague allegations of mala fides and the administrative context did not justify interference in revision; no sufficient prima facie case for injunction or failure of justice was shown. The refusal of interim injunction against transfer was sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 06 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199246