<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 46 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12009</link>
    <description>The court held that the transaction was a device to avoid tax, ruling against the assessee and holding him liable for capital gains tax on the value of the business transferred. However, the court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the goodwill amount, stating that it should not be taxed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 46 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12009</link>
      <description>The court held that the transaction was a device to avoid tax, ruling against the assessee and holding him liable for capital gains tax on the value of the business transferred. However, the court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the goodwill amount, stating that it should not be taxed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>