https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199235 The appeal filed under section 10F of the Companies Act challenging the CLB's order for rectification of share register under section 111A was dismissed. The CLB found no case under section 112, highlighted alleged collusion, lack of valid transfer endorsement, and failure to follow transfer procedures. The court upheld the CLB's decision, noting the lack of transfer details and company stamps on documents, along with legally valid reasons for non-production of original register. The court concluded the petitioner's case was false based on public documents, deeming the appeal meritless and dismissing it without costs. en-us Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Feb 2018 15:10:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199235 The appeal filed under section 10F of the Companies Act challenging the CLB's order for rectification of share register under section 111A was dismissed. The CLB found no case under section 112, highlighted alleged collusion, lack of valid transfer endorsement, and failure to follow transfer procedures. The court upheld the CLB's decision, noting the lack of transfer details and company stamps on documents, along with legally valid reasons for non-production of original register. The court concluded the petitioner's case was false based on public documents, deeming the appeal meritless and dismissing it without costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199235