<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 621 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199231</link>
    <description>Predominantly spice-based mixtures that retain the essential character of spices and are marketed as masala remain classifiable under Chapter 09, unless revenue proves that added ingredients change their character or take them out of that chapter. The tribunal found that the products other than Jiralu consisted mainly of spices, with only a small proportion of other ingredients, and that the revenue failed to discharge its burden to justify reclassification under mixed condiments, mixed seasonings, or edible preparations. Classification under Heading 09.03 was therefore upheld for those products. Jiralu was treated separately because the available material was insufficient, and the matter was remanded for limited reconsideration by the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 14:40:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 621 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199231</link>
      <description>Predominantly spice-based mixtures that retain the essential character of spices and are marketed as masala remain classifiable under Chapter 09, unless revenue proves that added ingredients change their character or take them out of that chapter. The tribunal found that the products other than Jiralu consisted mainly of spices, with only a small proportion of other ingredients, and that the revenue failed to discharge its burden to justify reclassification under mixed condiments, mixed seasonings, or edible preparations. Classification under Heading 09.03 was therefore upheld for those products. Jiralu was treated separately because the available material was insufficient, and the matter was remanded for limited reconsideration by the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>