https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199228 The Court held that the disciplinary review process under the Advocates Act could be entertained on proper grounds, and that rigid civil procedure analogies did not bar reconsideration where material bearing on the earlier decision had emerged. It further found that the charge of professional misconduct was not proved on the evidence: the alleged mutilation was not reliably established, the torn pieces were not properly preserved or matched, and the testimony of a single clerk lacked sufficient corroboration. As a result, the disbarring order could not stand and the disciplinary order was set aside. en-us Fri, 04 Sep 1970 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Oct 2018 12:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199228 The Court held that the disciplinary review process under the Advocates Act could be entertained on proper grounds, and that rigid civil procedure analogies did not bar reconsideration where material bearing on the earlier decision had emerged. It further found that the charge of professional misconduct was not proved on the evidence: the alleged mutilation was not reliably established, the torn pieces were not properly preserved or matched, and the testimony of a single clerk lacked sufficient corroboration. As a result, the disbarring order could not stand and the disciplinary order was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 Sep 1970 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199228