<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (9) TMI 360 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199227</link>
    <description>Disciplinary proceedings against an advocate are quasi-criminal and require a specific charge, framed issues, and full notice of the alleged misconduct to ensure a fair hearing. Professional misconduct must be proved beyond reasonable doubt, with benefit of doubt given to the advocate; it cannot rest on suspicion or a mere preponderance of probabilities. Where an advocate acts bona fide on instructions from a person believed to be authorised, misconduct is not established unless mens rea or culpable negligence is proved. The disciplinary order was set aside and the matter remitted for reconsideration on the existing record without enlarging the complaint.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 17:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (9) TMI 360 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199227</link>
      <description>Disciplinary proceedings against an advocate are quasi-criminal and require a specific charge, framed issues, and full notice of the alleged misconduct to ensure a fair hearing. Professional misconduct must be proved beyond reasonable doubt, with benefit of doubt given to the advocate; it cannot rest on suspicion or a mere preponderance of probabilities. Where an advocate acts bona fide on instructions from a person believed to be authorised, misconduct is not established unless mens rea or culpable negligence is proved. The disciplinary order was set aside and the matter remitted for reconsideration on the existing record without enlarging the complaint.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>