<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (3) TMI 429 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199223</link>
    <description>An unregistered conveyance deed transferring rights in immovable property did not confer title, because the exemption for grants or assignments of land was inapplicable and registration was compulsory. The plea that Government release made the deed redundant also failed, as the release provision applied only to requisition and not to property already acquired. Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 could not be used as a basis for affirmative relief by a plaintiff, since it operates only as a defensive shield. Mere possession was likewise insufficient to support an injunction against a party with superior title.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2018 12:40:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=510157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (3) TMI 429 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199223</link>
      <description>An unregistered conveyance deed transferring rights in immovable property did not confer title, because the exemption for grants or assignments of land was inapplicable and registration was compulsory. The plea that Government release made the deed redundant also failed, as the release provision applied only to requisition and not to property already acquired. Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 could not be used as a basis for affirmative relief by a plaintiff, since it operates only as a defensive shield. Mere possession was likewise insufficient to support an injunction against a party with superior title.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>